The innate characteristics of an individual, designed schematically, act independently of the external forces along with the outside historical conditions that s/he has surpassed so far, both shaping his or her conduct in many ways. If analysis is done carefully using an ethical lens based on humanistic values or as per dharma, you may come to the conclusion that the individuals having a nature of not compromising with the core or innate attributes rarely disturb others in any way, are constantly involved in a process of contradiction with the majority of the living humans having inverse opinions about the individuals stated above, which they pose conditionally whenever they get a chance to do so.
The majority of the living humans forming inverse opinions about an individual incur no loss in actual except for one that the views that the former makes for the latter and try to impose over him or her are countered repetitively and not accepted by the individual the way the majority of the living humans want, the corollary of which is that an individual accordingly becomes able to avoid the situation of facing loss that s/he might have faced if s/he allows and accepts uncritically the imposed inverse opinions at face value.
Here, an individual sticks to his or her core or innate characteristics, consequently forming his or her own principles, and constantly resists giving the control of his or her conduct to others till the last when s/he achieves enormous success. This is the point where the majority of the living humans show their real malleable nature, residing in external spaces outside of that space where an individual lives, struggling to protect one’s innate character, and ultimately, as per the demanded condition, the majority involve themselves in changing their stance with regard to the inverse opinions for which they've persistently argued.
___________________
30-01-2025
Rahul Khandelwal
