Arguments

• Never take the offered framework of seeing the truth unquestioningly. Always try inverting the offered model supported by the proposed reasoning at least once and analyze the same through your already considered framework of judging the truth along with the reasoning that you've generated as a result of your lived experiences and learning. All truths are not universal; some are conditioned by your immediate context, locale, and specificities. Claims must be checked through the process of contextualization.

• Painful moments experienced in real time transform into memories in post-real time; take the former time as a base to get more clarity because real time is relative to your existence. These memories ultimately become traumas that haunt you not in your prevailing real time but in the imaginary time created not subconsciously but unconsciously by your mind in your contemporary real time. This whole process acts silently and is fully independent of your consciousness.

• We are stuck in binaries and conditioned to think along those offered lines, which develops a certain kind of discourse of truth that is itself part of dominant knowledge. The created discourse is far away from that discourse of truth we are surrounded with physically and which is not covered by those binaries. In this way, we are stuck in two types of webs of truths. One is which we read, and the other is which we experience. Many times, we see strong contradictions between the two. This is one truth out of many truths of our times.

• The truth created by you as a result of self-realization might not coincide with the standardized order of truth accepted by the majority in the society under whose conditioning, the latter may categorize you on the basis of the episteme associated with the framework of truth that they are using. I am not in favor of the advocacy of seeing you on the basis of your arrangement only; rather, I propose that sometimes it is good if you see things inversely through changed positions and allow multiple models of truths for your perspective of judgement. My problem is with the idea of advocating the complete rejection of any version of standpoint.

___________________

19-08-2025

Rahul Khandelwal